Eritrea's historic endeavors to
promote the cause of internal peace and stability in the Sudan are well known to
merit emphasis. As it will be recalled, Eritrea played a pivotal role in the
articulation of the Declaration of Principles (DOP) that were announced in 1994
by IGAD to serve as a framework of solution to Sudan's perennial internal
conflicts that had raged incessantly since its independence in 1956.
In the subsequent years, Eritrea
worked unreservedly, together with its regional partners and in conjunction with
the IGAD Partners Forum, to persuade the Government of the Sudan and the SPLM/A
to advance the cause of peace through the implementation of the DOP.
When a new round of peace talks
resumed in Kenya in 2002, at first in Machakos and later in Naivasha, under the
auspices of IGAD but with the active involvement of the United States, Norway
and the United Kingdom, Eritrea recognized the critical leverage embodied in the
combined initiative and exerted all necessary efforts to ensure its success.
Eritrea's envoy to the peace talks contributed his share to the success of the
tortuous negotiations. Eritrea further used its historic and excellent ties with
the SPLM and the NDA to help lubricate the negotiations and to bring about a
lasting peace to the Sudan hinged on Justice and the equality of all its
constituent parties.
The horrendous crimes committed
by the Government in Khartoum in Dharfur and the atrocities and injustices it
has continued to perpetrate in the eastern and other underprivileged sections of
the country in spite of the Naivasha Peace Agreement have remained a cause of
concern to the Government of Eritrea and the international community as a whole.
While concrete negotiations are a matter for the Sudanese protagonists, Eritrea
has all along maintained that enduring peace in the Sudan will be realized
through the consolidation of the Naivasha Peace Agreement and the extension of
its underlying principles to similar cases of injustice. In this spirit, Eritrea
has exerted constructive efforts in the parallel peace negations held in Libya
and Nigeria recently between the government of the Sudan and the Dharfur
opposition movements.
Eritrea's constructive
engagement in, and positive contributions to, the peace process in the Sudan
emanate from its historic and good-neighborly ties with the peoples of the Sudan
as well as its recognition of the ramifications of durable peace in the Sudan to
regional stability and security. Eritrea's constructive engagements in the Sudan
have never been prejudiced by reactive considerations for counterbalancing the
irresponsible and provocative conduct of the NIF regime in Khartoum, which had
pursued throughout the years a regional and international agenda of
destabilization. Eritrea recognizes that these are problems of the past since
the implementation of the Naivasha Agreement will render the NIF's
fundamentalist agenda obsolete. In this context, groundless accusations leveled
against Eritrea by elements in the current NIF Government are either pretexts
put forth in order to derail the entire peace process and renege from its
commitments or deliberate diversion to foment problems in the region.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of
the State of Eritrea
Asmara, 28 June 2005.